Mini Cold Reads for Seducing Women

Here is a post I found by Tyler Durden, of Neil Strauss’s “The Game.” It is a goo post on cold reading. If you don’t already use cold reading as part of your game, I suggest you start implementing it.

Cold Reading and Seduction

INTRO:

WhiteDragonPUA (Eddy) and I always joke that shit like the CUBE, handwriting analysis, strawberry-fields, and palmreading, is CRACK for chicks.

We call it “CHICK-CRACK”.

They HAVE TO KNOW what stupid shit you can tell them about themselves, based on something ARBITRARY. I know Eddy has used this to bait chicks into isolation on MANY occassions, extracting all sorts of things from them in exchange for whatever fabricated information he’s willing to spew at them.

THEY-HAVE-TO-KNOW.

So what is the reasoning behind this???

THE BACKGROUND:

QUICK REVIEW (this stuff is to the best of my recollection, and its been a long time since I read ‘The Sexual Key’.. this is the main USEFUL part of it):

As explained in “The Sexual Key”, men like LINEAR progress, women like INTERNAL progress.

MEN:

Goal -> Goal -> Accomplishment

“I got the scholarship.” – “I don’t have to work this summer.” – “I have more time to pick up chicks.”

THE PAYOFF IS THE RESULT (“more time” in this case)

WOMEN:

—->—goal–>———>——-
|
/—>—-goal—->——— V
^ \ |
| | |
^ accomplishment——/ V
| |
\—goal——-< –goal—-<—-/

“I got the scholarship.” – “That validated my choices.” – “That showed me that I truly do have academic potential.” – “That made me feel incredible because it showed me more about myself.”

THE PAYOFF IS THE EMOTION, THAT RESULTED FROM A DEEPER UNDERSTANDING OF HERSELF, AND DISCOVERING HER *UNKNOWN/HIDDEN POTENTIALS*. (in this case, her academic abilities)

THE TACTIC:

How to encorporate this into a more high-impact, or possibly a GROUP SET???

MINI-COLD-READS, cocky-playful, peppered into your SET.

EXAMPLES OF MINI-COLD-READS:

-“you’re bad”
-“oooohhhh noooo.. you guys are *trouble*”
-“you guys are the nice ones.. I can only hang with you..”
-(for when she answers that she is NOT adventurous, during Swingcat qualifying)
“yeah.. you’re more quiet.. like Velma from Scoobie Doo.. you’re smart,.. and
you *solve mysteries*”
-“I don’t know about you.. I have a x-feeling about you..”
-“there’s something suspicious going on here… I’m not sure what, but I can
just feel it”
-“you guys are *fiesty*.. like little powerpuff girls”
-“you are *crazzzzzy*”
-“I can’t trust you guys”
-“ok, I can trust you now.. you guys are *IN*.. you’re trustworthy”
-“you’re my new bestfriend” (while caveman-ing her.. making the link from her letting you grab her, to her being your new best friend.. it makes NO SENSE whatsoever, but makes PERFECT sense to HER)
-“that-is-*awesome*.. you’re gonna be my NEW GIRLFRIEND” (after something ARBITRARY, like a line in her palm, or showing you a cool tatoo or something equally stupid, but is somehow DERIVED from something she showed you…)
-“you guys are like crime-fighters”
-“you guys are total bad-girls”
-“you’re the leader”
-“you guys are A-Crowd material” (after she says something cocky to you)
-“dude, these girls are obviously VERY adventurous”

GUY LOGIC VS. CHICK LOGIC:

GUY LOGIC:
A) X = X

B) X-characteristic = X-related-quality

C) you are carrying a gun and have 100,000$ cash in a briefcase = you are
probably a bad person”

D) “This guy’s got a gun and a briefcase.. he’s probably bad”

CHICK LOGIC:
A) X = Y

B) X-characteristic = Y-unrelated-quality

C) you are stupid girls sitting in a club looking around with a stupid look on
your face (that I can SAY I think looks ‘bad’, even though it doesn’t really
look like ANYTHING) = you are BADGIRLS

D) “these girls have a fiesty look in their eyes.. they are BADGIRLS”

MORE DETAILED EXAMPLES OF THE PROCESS:

Ask an arbitrary question. “Do girls think that David Bowie is hot?”, “Do you think I would look good if I died my hair ALL BLONDE?”, “Do you think that spells work?”, etc etc etc

REGARDLESS of her answer, PLAYFULLY-MISINTERPRET this as evidence that she is a “bad-girl”.

-“ooooohhhh nooooo… ooooohhh noooo.. you just like David Bowie because he’s total GLAM.. it’s always BADGIRLS that like that.. you’re bad, FOR SURE..”

-“oooh nooo.. my friend with BLONDE HAIR??? oh no, dude DO NOT listen to this girl, SHE-IS-BAD… look at the smile on her face.. dude, she is FIESTY.. do
NOT listen to this girl.. she has bad-girl written ALL OVER HER..”

-“spells? spells? oh no dude, we can’t talk to this girl.. she’s bad.. she-is-BAD.. look at the knowing grin on her.. she knows her stuff… I don’t even KNOW what this girl could be up to..”

SAME THING when you have NOTHING to go on.. Just pick an ARBITRARY quality on
her.. Her clothes, her smile, her aloofness, WHATEVER..

-“dude, LOOK at this girl.. LOOOOOOK.. see it in her eyes??? She is BAD..”

-“oh man, LOOK at the necklace on her.. oh man, this girl is FIESTY.. she is PLAYFUL.. she is ADVENTUROUS.. I *KNOW* girls like this..”

GROUP DYNAMICS – HOW TO USE THIS TO YOUR ADVANTAGE:

-Choose your target. If you call her “FIESTY”, then try saying it to her FRIENDS.. “This one is FIESTY, isn’t she???” This disarms the friends, similarly to Mystery’s technique of opening off of the ugliest person in the peer group. You are ADDRESSING the group, and you are NOT hitting on the friend in the “normal” way.

People may recall that I took an HB8.5 right off her DATE, using this technique. (“is she always tricky like this?? does she always do this?? she is FIESTY isn’t she?”, to the GUY she was on a date with.. he was DISARMED, and she was AROUSED.. a combo that works for you in MULTIPLE ways, simultaneously)

-Play the mini-cold-reads OFF OF eachother. “she IS bad.. you guys are the NICE ones (to the obstacles)… I can only hang with you guys.. you guys are safe.. this girl is BAD (to the target)..”

This gets the little LSE obstacles thinking that you’re nice, and DISARMS what you’re doing to their friend (your target).

CONCLUSION – CHICK LOGIC AS SEEN IN SOAP OPERAS:

Want to see stupid shit like this IN ACTION?? Check out a stupid soap-opera, like “Passions” or “Days of our Lives”.

You’ll notice that its *saturated* in STUPID SHIT, like:

-“Billy got trapped in the snowstorm, and now he can never find his true love with Lucette.. could the snowstorm really interfere with them finding the potential of their true love?!?!?!”

-“Patricia got a fake palm-reading because Janet hired a fake to trick her into thinking that Bo is her true love, and not Ethan.. Will Patricia ever really find true happiness?”

-“Melissa hired a street-thug to SWITCH the paternity tests, so that she could be with Jake, even though its really not his son.. Now Jake will have to be with HER, and Crystal will never fulfill the love that she had with Jake, all because of this terrible trickery!”

-“Allen slipped DRUGS into Alicia’s drink, WITHOUT HER KNOWING.. now she’s a drug-addict, and a prostitute.. a total BADGIRL.. and its not her fault!”

THIS IS WHAT GIRLS ARE *ADDICTED* TO.

Shit where X = Y, and it makes NO SENSE WHATSOEVER, except through LEAPS of logic. There has to be SOME logic to it, but since its CHICK-LOGIC, there is no actual SOUNDNESS required.

You can generate this CRACK FOR CHICKS in the field, by making ILLOGICAL conclusions, that some particular quality leads to some EXCITING characteristic about them, that they weren’t aware of, but maybe had fantasized at some point that they had.

Just pepper it in there, and watch as they CAN’T stop talking to you.

Then, use MYSTERY METHOD to EXPLOIT the social-proof, throw negs, and isolate.

Or just use it to suck a lonewolf into a convo, during a street sarge. It’s useful in many areas.

Tyler Durden